Talking about F-Day: The Second Dawn Of Man with Nicole King of RTV Marbella, Spain. Recorded in August 2016
A few people have been asking about the difference between an Open Economy and a Resource-Based Economy, so I thought I’d make a post about it.
In a broad sense, the two concepts are the same – a more abundant, peaceful and sustainable world beyond money and borders. The difference is in the fundamental approach of arriving to this destination.
Because technology can – and already does – most of the hard work for us now.
Producing all of life’s necessities like food, clothing and building is already many times easier today than forty years ago, and it’s only going to get easier. Automated vertical farming, advanced cultivating techniques and 3D printed clothing and homes are already here.
We would all be in a better, moneyless society tomorrow if everyone understood how and why it works, but the truth is that it’s a very difficult idea to convince people of. So why is that? As someone who has been trying to sell this idea to people for about five years now, I’ve had plenty of time to think about this question, and this article is what I’ve come up with so far.
Imagine you are going out for the evening to meet three of your best friends – all going for a nice meal and a drink at your favourite restaurant. Throughout the night everyone is very relaxed, enjoying each others’ company, having a good chat, sharing some memories and laughs, and talking about whatever’s going on in their lives. Sounds like a pleasant way to spend an evening, right?
Some of us working with The Free World Charter initiative believe that Iceland could be the perfect place to begin a money-free or gift economy. Here’s why:
While these ideas have been brought about by non-Icelanders, it is our hope to get enough support for the idea to at least start a conversation among the Icelandic people and authorities. it is our hope that they may see the value in pioneering a money-free cooperative community and become an example for the rest of the world, showing that a future world beyond money and hierarchical rule is not only possible but highly desirable.
1. While we admit that Iceland could never be fully self-sufficient and will always require a certain amount of skills and resources from outside, we would hope that other countries would support Iceland’s endeavours. Of course there’s no guarantee this will happen, but it seems reasonable to assume that, given humanity’s natural desire to contribute and the positive, daring nature of the proposal that other countries would offer assistance.
2. Since Iceland may become vulnerable to exploitation and unable to defend its territory in the event of such attempts, it may be possible to contrive external protection of its borders through some UN decree which would grant Iceland a ‘protected’ money-free status. This ‘money-free’ status could then also be applied to other countries who wished to follow Iceland’s example.
3. As of writing, all of this is pure speculation and is not founded on any established fact or current debate. This projects aims to highlight and garner support for the idea, in order to begin a conversation on the idea.
If you would like to support this idea, then please join our Facebook page at: https://www.facebook.com/icelandfree
Download both F-Day and Into The Open Economy books, PLUS an extra exclusive article and some desktop wallpapers for just €9.99!!
Source: Freeworlder Blog
Torn between this title or ‘Promoting Sane Solutions In A Crazy World’. Eventually using the ‘ ‘ quotes won the day. The point is, as all you Free World ‘Crazy’ people know, presenting the idea of a moneyless society to your family and friends can be an uncomfortable, unpleasant experience at best, and, at worst can lead to you becoming isolated or even suffering broken relationships. So, after talking to many people on this topic, and from my own personal experience, I thought it might be useful to present these seven tips for presenting our ‘Crazy’ Free World ideas to newbies in a positive and respectful way.